🔗 Share this article

I have some opinions about the comments delivered by ESPN commentator a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's win over Taylor Fritz in the US Open quarter-finals. Consider – the athlete represents American, the commentator is from the US – and athletic competitions frequently lend themselves to nationalism. A little bit of letdown would have been appropriate. Instead, he brought up the ongoing absence of US male players at the majors: not one of them had lifted a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the tournament.

Everyone enjoy a narrative, me too. But really. Even if Fritz defeated Djokovic for the first time, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was waiting in the next round, whom he has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And had he somehow survived that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, against whom the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also split the last seven major titles (and Alcaraz proceeded to defeat a fatigued Djokovic in the subsequent match). He stated in press after the loss that he actually liked his draw, because it presented the chance to defeat the top three players in the world in succession. Fritz is well within his right to aim for the accomplishment; an athlete is meant to believe in themselves. But entering that Djokovic quarter-final who else sensibly had the lack of US winners in mind?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the sole barrier standing in her way and sustained success

Fritz, twenty-eight, is placed fourth in the global rankings starting this week’s year-end championships and has secured his previous six encounters over third-ranked the German with increasing ease. It's likely he could take that spot for himself in the future. But it’s clear that at present, that’s as high as he can climb: Sinner and Alcaraz lie a vast gap of performance metrics away. His top-class delivery and concussive strength on each front side and reverse side are sufficiently adequate to defeat most rivals on the professional circuit. When facing the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, though, he is often helpless. The past few years has witnessed the interesting emergence of lanky, towering players who can nevertheless cover the court with the alarming quickness and grace of smaller men. Fritz is six-foot-five and looks it. His footwork is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he seldom win a rally that the opponent was dictating, and hitting a soft shot versus him is usually a reliable tactic. That serves as a quite severe limitation on his upside.

The American has achieved a number of dramatic, improbable advancements over the years. Early on of the decade, he was hovering around the bottom of the world's best thirty. Two years later, he was approaching the elite ten. Last year, he unexpectedly surged to fourth place – and held the position. But the subsequent step, mixing it up with and beating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, Sinner, and even a declining Serbian, is the toughest of all. What could the commentator have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the continuing slump of American men lifting major titles when Fritz had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply excessive and the respect for the difficulty of the challenge too little.

Taylor Fritz achieved a personal best advancement to the Wimbledon semi-finals in the summer.

Fritz’s performance in that exact quarter-final ought to have been enough of an indication. Djokovic won in four rounds, a win that only seemed uncertain for moments towards the very end, when the American had saved a few championship opportunities and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The pair looked well-balanced during the exchanges, with Fritz creating numerous opportunities to break. But Djokovic rescued break point after service break opportunity, prolonging the streak to the point of frustration. When he finally did claim one of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a terrible service game to drop serve once more; Djokovic had drawn him into a battle secondary to the real battle and forced him to expend far too much effort to prevail. Down set points in the last game, his first serve sailed to heaven. He extended the match twice on his second serve, but finally double-faulted. It wasn’t a collapse, in my opinion, just a consequence of having to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The contest was fairly ironclad proof that Fritz is not good enough to beat any form of Djokovic, that lost to the Spaniard in the next round and did not particularly seem like he believed he could triumph. This is perfectly fine – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the height of his physical powers now, but has acquired enough knowledge and strategic intelligence to make up for a significant portion of the decline. The issue is those who were anticipating Fritz to win, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was had not accomplished anything that suggested he could.

The American is an asset to the circuit regardless. He’s a calm, thoughtful voice in media sessions, exceeding almost anyone on the ATP except for the Russian star, prepared to not only say how he feels or the strategy he believed determined a contest, but clarify it. That he should bear the brunt of the responsibility for America not produce a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unfair. (Since the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, maybe they can share that burden.)

ATP Finals: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Group

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Division

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely think about it forever if I fail to accomplish it,” the American informed an interviewer in June of winning a major. I hope he understands that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t achieve that objective, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s young, terrifying reign is actually highly unlikely for everybody else. {